Thursday, October 19, 2017 by Ethan Huff
A radical Islamic terrorist is currently employed as a college instructor at California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA). His name is Mohammed Abed, a tenure-track professor of ethics, social and political philosophy, and classical Islamic philosophy, who since at least 2006 has been advocating for the genocide of racist white people as a moral imperative for society.
California taxpayers are paying for Abed to tell 18-22 year-olds that mass murder isn’t always a bad thing. There are some cases, he says, in which it’s not just permissible to target an entire racial group for annihilation, but “morally required.” In his thesis, entitled “The Concept of Genocide Reconsidered” which was first published in 2006, Abed breaks down his argument by deconstructing the reader’s assumed belief that massacring large numbers of people is a bad thing.
“One can certainly concoct a hypothetical scenario in which the deliberate annihilation of a group’s way of life is a ‘moral and political imperative,'” Abed’s thesis rationalizes. “And there may be a case for classifying as genocide campaigns of social deconstruction that are widely considered to be not only excusable but morally required.”
Using the Confederacy as an example of the types of white folks that he thinks need to be mass murdered, Abed rewrites history in his thesis by claiming that practically all white folks living in the South before the Civil War owned slaves. Ignoring the fact that many Africans willingly sold their own people into slavery with not a single white person in sight, Abed goes on to flesh out his anti-white racism and desire for white genocide.
“It would not be wildly implausible to say that their (Southern whites) investment in the culture and norms of the slave-owning community rivaled in its social meaning and significance an individual’s affiliation with a national or religious group,” Abed argues.
“But because the kidnapping, enslavement, and lifelong exploitation of innocent human beings was a constitutive and thus ineliminable feature of the life led by many Southern whites, annihilating their way of life was a moral imperative. The right course of action was to strip them of an identity that gave meaning to their lives.”
At the same time, Abed wants the world to know that, despite his chomping at the bit to see white people go extinct, he really does just want to integrate into Western culture. Oh, and so do all of his fellow radical Islamic terrorists relocating by the tens of thousands into Europe and the United States.
What Abed is describing with Muslims invading Western nations and supplanting them is known as Hijrah. It’s the immigration equivalent of jihad, where Muslim invaders flood a nation and out-populate its indigenous people. Islam has an extensive history of committing Hijrah, as evidenced by 1,400 years of Islamic history.
In Islam, Hijrah is actually considered to be far more meritorious than jihad, and fetches a much greater reward in Muslim heaven than the former. Blowing oneself up with a bomb vest while screaming “Allahu Akbar!” just isn’t as spiritually lucrative, in other words, as taking over large swaths of Europe and turning them into violent terrorist zones.
“Why would immigrants attempt to systematically undermine norms and institutional structures that guarantee their democratic freedoms, including their right to be culturally different and to practice their religion without hindrance?” Abed writes.
We’re asking ourselves the same question, Abed: so why don’t you tell us?
Abed’s “RateMyProfessor” profile is available here.
He can also be reached by email at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Sources for this article include: